当前位置:洪恩在线 -> 轻松英语 -> 休闲英语 -> 环宇时空
 


 

SHOULD WE CLONE HUMAN

Limited cloning?

Some have speculated[1] whether it would be possible on the basis of these discoveries to grow not an entire human being, but living organs from cells. This might have certain potential to treat diseased organs or malfunctioning body processes. There would be many practical questions to answer, but it might be less of a problem ethically.

One ethical point would be that it would only be done only for the benefit of the individual involved, or, with appropriate informed consent, a close relative. Perhaps the biggest ethical problem would be that of "gradualism". By a progression of small steps you could eventually provide all the conditions needed to clone the conditions needed to clone the entire human being. This raises a much deeper question about how the direction of research is determined and controlled.

What do you do with a Genie out of the Bottle?

It is impossible to reverse knowledge, but it is society's prerogative[2] to state which pieces of knowledge should remain unused -"can do" never implies "must do". It is rightly illegal to clone a human being in the UK, but it would not be beyond human perversity for someone to try to do it elsewhere in the world. One UK doctor, who has publicly condemned the very idea, claims to have had people offering themselves for cloning or asking to have it done to loved ones. It would appear that some are attracted by the idea, but maybe they have not fully understood the implications. Even supposing someone would be stupid enough to try, there are many serious obstacles to be overcome. There is firstly the risk of imprisonment. A scientist would take the risk of ostracism from a disapproving medical and scientific establishment, and know that journal would possibly refuse to publish any paper on the subject. Then he or she would have to persuade or induce dozens of people to take part in prolonged illegal experiments. It would need donors, egg cell recipients and surrogate[3] mothers in fairly large numbers, to take part in experiments. Abnormally large progeny have resulted in animal cloning done to date, which suggests that there are serious risks to the health of the mother and any potential embryo.

In order to prevent the genie from coming out of the bottle, there should be immediate moves to set up, if possible, an internationally binding treaty to an experiments regarding human cloning worldwide.

 

   

 

注释:

 

1. speculate
思索,深思,推测。比如:speculate about the origin of the universe思索宇宙的起源。

 

 

2. prerogative
特权。exercise one's prerogative表示“行使自己的特权”。它的近义词是privilege,前者(prerogative)指特权,大权,包括生而有之的和因官职,地位等而获得的,尤指王权。而后者(privilege)则指给予特定人的权利或利益。

 

 

3. surrogate
替代品,替身。它经常与for连用,比如:surrogate for sth.某物的代理人。

 
 
 

 

我们应当克隆人吗?

搞有限克隆如何?

有人思索这样一个问题——能否利用发现的克隆技术,由细胞生成活的器官而不是整个人。也许这是潜在的治疗病变器官的手段或是解决失灵机体运转的手段。虽有许多实际问题需要解决,但在伦理上问题可能不那样严重了。

一个伦理问题是:克隆器官只用于患者本身,或在征得郑重的认可之后用于一位近亲。或许最大的伦理问题是“渐进论”说法,即克隆器官技术规模由小到大,有朝一日终将走向克隆一个完整的人。这就引发了如何确定并控制该项研究方向的更深层次问题。

如何对待从瓶中出来的怪物?

知识的进化是不可逆的。但是社会有权指出哪种知识暂不当利用。“可利用”决不意味着“必须利用”。在英国,克隆人被正确地规定为非法。但不能排除在世界某个地方有某个有悖常情的人试图那样做。有一个曾公开谴责克隆人这个想法的英国医生,声称已经有人自动提出愿意被克隆,或要求对他们所爱的人进行克隆。似乎有些人被克隆人这个想法所吸引,但他们却对这意味着什么尚无所知。即使真的有人愚蠢到以身相试,在实施中也会受到重重阻力。首先是坐牢的风险。一位科学家会冒因此而被采取不赞成态度的医学界和科学界所排斥的风险,而他会知道任何一家学术刊物都会拒绝发表有关这类主题的论文。其次,这位科学家还不得不去说服或引诱众多数量的人参与这些旷日持久的非法试验。这些非法试验需要相当数量的细胞捐献者、卵细胞接收者和代理母亲。还有一点需要指出的是,目前对动物进行的克隆已产生形体异常硕大的后代。这意味着母亲和任何潜在的胚胎的健康都将面临严重的威胁。

为了阻止瓶中怪物跑出瓶外,人类应该马上行动起来,如有可能,制订出国际性的限制条约,禁止在世界范围内的一切与克隆人相关的试验。